Meaning
A semi-structured diagnostic protocol assesses the mental representations an adult maintains regarding early relational care. The adult attachment interview presents a sequence of direct questions concerning childhood separations, distress, losses and parental responses. Transcripts are evaluated not for historical accuracy, but for the linguistic organisation and emotional balance maintained under conversational demand.
The protocol ceases to apply when discourse is constrained by severe cognitive impairment or acute psychosis.
Structural Demand
Specific questions require the speaker to retrieve early memories while simultaneously maintaining coherent dialogue with an interviewer. The adult attachment interview exposes defensive strategies by requiring biographical evidence for broad characterisations of parents. A speaker who describes a parent as loving must produce specific episodes supporting that claim.
Contradictions between generalised evaluations and specific episodic memories become apparent through this targeted pressure. Discourse marks the difference between open retrieval and defensive dismissal.
Scoring Dimension
Transcripts receive formal ratings across multiple scales that measure narrative organisation and collaborative communication. Gricean maxims of quality, quantity, relation and manner provide the systematic baseline for scoring speaker discourse. A transcript showing succinct, relevant and evidenced reflection receives high marks for coherence regardless of reported adversity.
Incoherence appears through excessive length, angry preoccupation, defensive brevity or lapses in the monitoring of reasoning.
Classification Boundary
Evaluated transcripts resolve into primary categories denoting secure, dismissing, preoccupied or unresolved states of mind regarding attachment. A classification describes current mental organisation rather than historical fact. An adult reporting severe childhood neglect can receive a secure classification if the narrative remains organised and reflective.
The assessment reflects representational capacity rather than factual biography.