
Reading the seat, not the claim
Terms get argued with what a person claims to be, and then delivered out of the seat that person actually holds. I read one arrangement by its claim for years, and not because the claim convinced me: it was holding

Terms get argued with what a person claims to be, and then delivered out of the seat that person actually holds. I read one arrangement by its claim for years, and not because the claim convinced me: it was holding

Two seats that build together make a third thing neither would have built alone. At the split each seat carries out what it brought, and the third thing goes to the name on the register, not to whoever made it.

For years the arrangement's books had a line for everyone whose position was decided. Mine was not a line. I was the conditions the lines sat in, and I let that stand, because naming myself as load-bearing felt like asking
The terms are written where they belong. Each field holds three desks, and every entry a desk writes raises the terms it uses, each term given a meaning, a mechanism and the places it appears. The record on these pages stays first person and hand made; the fields grow the nomenclature.